HSE Report Released Regarding Fatality Rates in Industry

The HSE has compiled and released their provisional annual report regarding fatal accidents in the workplace, highlighting which industries are the most dangerous for its workers.

Figures in a provisional annual report compiled by the HSE shows that between April 2014 and March 2015, 142 employees died in accidents at work. This is an increase from the previous year’s figure of 136-an all-time low. These numbers represent a rate of 0.46 fatalities per 100,000 workers. This is one of the lowest fatality rates among workers in many of the leading industrial nations.

Agriculture, recycling and construction all were among the most dangerous jobs for their workers Agriculture had the highest rate of 9.12 fatalities per 100,000 workers, and the number of fatal accidents last year increased from 27 to 33. The recycling industry had a rate of 4.31 fatalities per 100,000, with a total of five deaths last year. The latest figures show that in the construction industry, the total number of deaths fell from 44 to 35 between 2013/2014 and 2014/2015.

Judith Hackett commented on the report, stating that “It is disappointing last year’s performance on fatal injuries has not been matched, but the trend continues to be one of improvement. Our systems and our framework remain strong as demonstrated by our performance in comparison to other countries. Every fatality is a tragic event and our commitment to preventing loss of life in the workplace remains unaltered.  All workplace fatalities drive HSE to develop even more effective interventions to reduce death, injury and ill health”.

Also included in the report was figures for deaths due to mesothelioma cancer. The cancer is caused by exposure to asbestos, and is one of the only diseases that is due to working conditions that can be recorded. In 2013, 2,538 deaths were attributable to such exposure-a slight decrease from 2,548 deaths in 2012.

Compensation Claim Reduced in Milk Tanker Accident as Motorcyclist Found Partly Liable

The settlement to be awarded to a young motorcyclist as the result of an accident with a milk tanker has been reduced as the he was ruled partly liable for the injury.

Adam Wagner (23) was riding his motorcycle along the B7076 Gretna to Johnstonebridge Road at night in August 2009. On his journey, he noticed lights of a vehicle that he presumed was approaching him on the road. Adam dipped his headlights as a result, and continued driving at a speed of around 50 miles per hour.

However, as Adam approached the lights, he realised that they were not coming from an approaching vehicle at all. The source was an articulated milk tanker that was reversing into a nearby farm, and blocking both carriageways of the road in the process. Adam attempted to avoid the vehicle, but while swerving, hit the offside wheel of the tanker’s trailer. Adam was brought to hospital, where he remained unconscious for two days. When he awoke, he found that his left leg had been amputated below the knee.

After seeking legal advice, Adam made a compensation claim for the injury caused by the milk tanker accident against the driver of the tanker-Thomas Grant-and the company who owned the truck, Arla Foods UK PLC. Adam alleged that there was a lack of lighting on the side of the trailer, and this it was difficult to see that it was blocking the carriageway. Alastair Pasco, Adam’s uncle, supported such a claim, as he had been following Adam home on the night of the accident.

The defendants denied liability for Adam’s accident, claiming that the tanker was indeed adequately lit, and warning hazard lights were clearly displayed to other road users. They further stated that the reversing milk tanker would have been clearly visible to anyone who was paying attention while driving.

Liability for the injuries was initially denied, and after three years of long negotiations, Thomas Grant’s insurers offered £9,000 to Adam so that he could make appropriate renovations to his house in light of his injury. Despite receiving recommendations from his solicitors to accept the claim, Adam rejected it, stating that he wanted a full settlement. As a result, his solicitors refused to represent him further with the case.

After finding new legal representatives, Adam and his solicitor took the milk tanker accident to the Court of Session. Lord Uist heard their claim that Thomas Grant should not have performed the reversing manoeuvre without appropriate lighting on the vehicle, and that Arla Foods should have carried out risk assessment procedures before collecting milk from the farm at night.

When the hearing ended, Lord Uist agreed that the reversing manoeuvre was “inherently dangerous”, but he did believe that the vehicle had been adequately lit. He further stated that it was significant that neither Adam nor his uncle-who was an experienced motorcyclist of over 20 years-failed to see the tanker blocking the westbound carriageway.

60% of the liability was attributed to Arla Foods and Thomas Grant, and the remaining was to Adam. The compensation claim was reduced from £568,926 to £341,356 accordingly.

High Court Judge Approves Compensation for Fall in Farmyard Barn

A judge in the Dublin High Court has approved a settlement for fall in farmyard barn compensation of €300,000, with split liability between the parties.

Con Oxley of Cullahill, County Laois, was working as a self-employed electrician in August 2008 when he was tasked with implementing a lighting installation in a barn on a farm in Ballacolla.

While rolling out electric cable required for the job, he stepping onto a wooden plank that was suspended between two boxes. The plank broke from his weight, and he fell 2.5 metres to the floor below him. He hit his head on impact, suffering brain damage as a result. Con lost his senses of smell and taste, and now only has partial vision in his left eye.

Con sought legal counsel, and decided to make a compensation claim against the farm’s owner for the injuries he sustained in the fall. Con alleged that the planks had been provided to him by Mark Quigley-the farm’s owner-stating that the planks provided to him were unsuitable for purpose.

Con further claimed that Quigley further neglected his safety by failing to put supports mechanisms in place beneath the planks on which he was working, or any device that would stop a fall, should one occur.

The defendant denied liability for Con’s injuries. As a result, Con sought authorisation from the Injuries Board to pursue his case for farmyard fall compensation in court, which was granted. Before the hearing was scheduled, an out-of-court agreement was made between the parties to split the liability evenly between them. In return for Quigley not admitting full liability for the accident, Con received a settlement of €300,000.

Mr Justice Kearn of the High Court in Dublin approved the settlement for the compensation claim, stating that it had been a good one in the circumstances of the fall. He also said that the fall was partially Con’s fault, due to his failure to thoroughly inspect the plank before stepping onto it. This contributory negligence would have gone against him had the case gone to a full trial.

Fatal Fall at Farm Depot Case Resolved

The fines and sentences have been announced regarding the corporate manslaughter of an employee who died after falling through the roof of a building at a Farm Depot.

In October 2011, Jason Pennington (42), an employee at the building company Peter Mawson Ltd, was working to fix a leaky roof at the West Cumberland Farmers Depot in Cumbria. As Jason traversed the roof, he stepped onto a skylight. The glass broke, causing Jason to fall seven metres onto the concrete floor below him. The emergency services were notified, and Jason was immediately transported to the nearby Furness General Hospital. Unfortunately, he died a short time later due to his injuries.

An investigation into the fall was launched by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). It was found that no precautions were taken to ensure that the roof was safe to work on, or to prevent the fatal fall should the roof give way. As a result, the building company and its owner-Peter Mawson-were prosecuted for failing to ensure the safety of employees contrary to the Health and Safety at Work Act, and for corporate manslaughter.

At the Preston Crown Court in December of that year, the defendants pled guilty to the allegations against them. In earlier this month, an announcement was made regarding the fines and sentences for the fatal fall from height accident. The building company was fined £200,000 for the corporate manslaughter offence, and a further £20,0000 for the breach of Health and Safety regulations.

Peter Mawson was sentenced to eight months in prison (suspended for two years), 200 hours unpaid work, and also told to pay costs of £31,504. He was further ordered to advertise what happened in the local newspaper, and on the company’s website.

The investigating inspector for the HSE, Chris Hatton, said:“Jason tragically lost his life because the company that employed him did nothing to make sure he was safe while he worked on a fragile roof”.

“Peter Mawson knew the clear panels on the roof weren’t safe to walk on but neither he nor his company provided any equipment to prevent workers falling to their death. If scaffolding or netting had been fitted under the fragile panels, or covers had been fitted over them, then Jason would still be here today.”

Company Found Guilty for Crane Accident Death

A manufacturing company has been found guilty of breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, causing the death of one of its employees in a crane accident.

In July 2011, Michael Wickstead (63) of Greater Manchester was employed for Refinery Supplies Ltd. At the time of the accident, Michael had been working on manufacturing a three-tonne steel container, which was resting on a stand that was secured in place by chains hanging from an overhead crane. One of his colleagues was moving another container with an overhead crane when the two cranes collided in the air. The collision caused the container on which Michael was working to fall, crushing him underneath it.

Michael’s injuries proved fatal. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) launched an investigation into his death, and the work environment and circumstances surrounding it. When the investigation was complete, it was revealed that there was no clear working system implemented to ensure that the employees were not at risk of being involved in crane accidents, and there was no safety mechanism implemented-such as anti-collision devices-to prevent the two cranes from crashing into each other.

Refinery Supplies Ltd-who specialise in manufacturing equipment for the lead and zinc refining industry-were prosecuted with a breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 by the HSE. At the Manchester Crown Court, representatives from the company pleaded guilty to the charges and for failing to ensure that the necessary precautions were implemented to prevent such deaths. The company was fined £90,000 and ordered to pay £25,000 in costs.

The HSE Inspector involved with the case-Helen Jones-said:

“Michael sadly lost his life because the safety standards of his employer fell well below the minimum legal standards. “Refinery Supplies knew there was a risk of cranes colliding at the factory and, in fact, this had happened on several previous occasions without the same catastrophic result. However, the firm failed to take any action to make sure workers weren’t put at risk of being injured”.

“It’s vital that manufacturers carefully consider the dangers facing their employees and then implement safety improvements. If Refinery Supplies had done this then Michael’s tragic death could have been avoided.”

FSAI Re-Issues Frozen Berry Hepatitis A Warning

The Food Safety Authority has re-issued advice to boil frozen berries due to a hepatitis A threat that has been identified in the foods. A similar alert was issued last year, after there was an outbreak of the disease across Europe. Despite investigations, no single point of origin of the contamination was found.

The FSAI stated that it initially grew concerned that several cases of Hepatitis A had been reported over the summer which they could not attribute to overseas travel. Around 1,440 cases of inexplicable Hepatitis A have been reported in twelve different European countries since the original warning last year. 331 cases had been confirmed by genotyping techniques, and 21 of those occurred in Ireland.

The chief executive of the FSAI-Professor Alan Reilly-ensured to comment that the cases of Hepatitis A was due to berries imported into the country, and not berries grown here. He did urge people to remember that although fresh berries were not a Hepatitis A threat, they should still be washed thoroughly before consumption.

Professor Reilly also encouraged those working in the catering industry to check the source of their berries, ensuring that they are reputable suppliers with comprehensive food safety management systems in place.

The National Virus Reference Laboratory, the Health Protection Surveillance Centre and the Health Service Executive are all collaborating with the FSAI to track the source of the infected frozen berries, and cross-reference their findings with a similar investigation in Italy.

Due to the incubation period of fifteen to fifty days, victims of the disease may have eaten contaminated berries prior to the FSAI’s warning, and before affected retailers and the opportunity to remove the products from their shelves. In spite of this, the retailers and manufacturers all have a duty of care to supply goods which do not pose a threat to the health of those who consume them. If you-or anyone you know-have suffered from Hepatitis A due to eating the contaminated fruit, you should seek legal counsel regarding a compensation claim.

HSE Prosecutes Farm For Safety Failings

A dairy farm in Durham have been fined by the Magistrate’s Court after being prosecuted by the HSE for safety failings which resulted in an employee sustaining injuries after falling from a height.

In September 2013, Simon Atkinson (41) of Dipton, County Durham, was unloading empty milk bottles from a lorry and placing them into a storage area 1.6 metres below ground level at his local Lanchester Dairies site. Simon was working alone at the time of the incident.

While working, Simon slipped and fell through the opening of the storage area-landing on the concrete surface below him. Due to the force of the impact, Simon fractured his eye socket, and sustained several fractures to his collar bone. He also broke one of his ribs.

When he was transported to hospital, it was revealed that Simon was bleeding in his skull. He had to be put into an induced coma to remove a blood clot that had formed at the side of his brain, and he was unable to return to work while waiting for further surgery to repair damage to his spine.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) launched an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the incident. They found that no safety measures had been taken to prevent a fall from height accident on the dairy farm, despite a risk assessment having been conducted which had notified the owners of the farm there a risk of a fall existed.

The HSE proceeded to prosecute Lanchester Dairies Ltd under Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and, at Peterlee Magistrates Court, the company pleaded guilty. They admitted that they failed to implement a safe system of work and training for the unloading task.

It was revealed that there had been a fixed barrier across the doorway to the storage area two years prior to the incident, but it had been removed and never replaced. Had such a device been in place at the time of the accident, it is likely that Simon would not have sustained the injuries that he did.

Lanchester Dairies Ltd were fined £10,000 and ordered to pay £1,690 in legal costs by the Magistrates. The HSE inspector involved in the case-Michael Kingston-commented that the company had been aware of the risks associated with the unloading operation, and had neglected to implement the simple and inexpensive measure to prevent a fall from height accident on their farm, resulting in Simon’s injury.

Young Boy Killed by Slurry Pit Fumes

A young boy has been killed by exposure to fumes and his father left in a critical condition after a slurry put accident in County Antrim.

Robert Christie (8) was mixing slurry with his father on a farm belonging to a family friend near Donloy, County Antrim, when the pair were overcome by fumes from the pit. The father and son both collapsed, and the alarm was raised by a postman who was visiting the farm.

The emergency services were immediately notified, and Robert was airlifted to Belfast’s Royal Victoria Hospital. Despite strenuous efforts, the medical staff present were unable to save the young boy’s life. His father-Bertie (52)-was taken to Causeway Hospital where he remains in critical condition.

The family has requested that no further details have been released about how the young boy was killed in the slurry pit accident. Barclay Bell-the deputy President of the Ulster Farmers Union-explained in a statement how such fatal accidents with slurry pits occur.

Mr Bell informed the press that slurry pits are pits that contain waste products produced by farm animals over the winter months. The waste stays in such pits over a period of several months, during which time a fatal combination of gases are created and released. The most dangerous of these gases is hydrogen sulphide.

The slurry pit’s contents are used to fertilise farmlands, but before it can be spread across the land, it needs to be mixed and agitated. This process releases the lethal fumes into the surrounding atmosphere, and it is difficult to know when they have diffused away as they are scentless gases.

The gases are denser than air, so they stay closer to the ground. This could explain how young Robert was killed in the slurry pit accident while his father only suffered an injury due to being less exposed, as he was higher up from the ground.

Keith Morrison – Chief Executive of Northern Ireland´s Health and Safety Executive said: “Incidents like this show starkly the dangers which our farming communities face and my heart goes out to those affected by this tragic accident”.

Heinz Fined £50,000 Following Manufacturing Plant Accident

Heinz has been fined £50,000 for health and safety violations following an accident at a manufacturing plant during which one of its workers lost their hand.

In June 2013, Alec Brackenbury (49) of Bacton, Norfolk was working in a manufacturing plant owned by Heinz in Worstead, Norfolk. He was manning a potato peeling machine when he tried to retrieve a bolt that had fallen into a slurry pump. Alec believed that the electrical supply to the slurry pump was connected to the potato peeling machine and had been isolated. Therefore, he put his right hand into the unguarded machine. The machine suddenly started to operate, severing Alec’s hand at the wrist.

Alec was immediately transported to the local Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, where he received medical attention. Despite their efforts, the medical staff at the hospital were unable to save his hand. Alec had to undergo eight different operations on the stump of his hand over the two-week period following the accident. As a result of losing his hand, Alec is unable to work, drive or perform many daily tasks.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) launched an investigation into Alec’s accident. Inspectors discovered that a protective gate which should have been bolted to the top of the slurry pump was absent at the time of the accident. Had such a gate been in place, the accident would have been prevented and Alec would not have lost his hand.

The HSE inspectors prosecuted Heinz for their negligence and, at the Norwich Magistrates’ Court, the company was fined £50,000 for being guilty of breaching Regulation 11(1) o the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. The company was also ordered to pay £9,661 in costs.

The HSE Inspector involved with the case-Tony Brooks-stated: “Heinz failed to protect Mr Brackenbury while he was contracted to carry out maintenance work at their Westwick plant and, as a result, he has suffered a life-changing injury. Heinz failed to protect Mr Brackenbury while he was contracted to carry out maintenance work at their Westwick plant and, as a result, he has suffered a life-changing injury.”

Electrical Contractor Fined for Fall on a Farm Accident

Gregg Electrical has been fined £2,000 for breaching health and safety legislation that resulted in one of his apprentices falling from the roof of a barn.

In June 2013, an unnamed teenager (sixteen years old at the time of the incident) was working as an apprentice for Austin Gregg (trading as Gregg Electrical). He was working with another apprentice and Gregg himself when they were employed to install solar panels on the roof of a bran located at Leyburn Farm, North Yorkshire.

The teenager was asked to retrieve a tool from the roof of the barn on which the solar panels were installed. The teenager neglected to put a harness on to perform the supposedly simple task. While he was on the roof, the teenager stumble and fell through a partially covered roof light onto the concrete floor metres below.

The apprentice only suffered from severe bruising from his fall, despite the height from which he fell. A HSE investigation was launched into the incident, and it was discovered that Gregg had taken inadequate precautions in ensuring that an accident of this nature would not occur. Inspectors from the HSE determined that, even if the apprentice had used a safety harness, the fixing points for it were inadequate and had not been properly tested.

The Northallerton Magristrate’s Court fined the electrical contracted £2,000 with £505 in costs for a breach of Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. As of yet, no injury claim for compensation for the fall form height accident on the farm has been filed by the apprentice. Since the teenager was sixteen years of age at the time of the incident, he has three years from his eighteenth birthday during which he could claim compensation for his injuries according to the Statute of Limitations for accidents such as this.

Car Accident Victim Receives Compensation for Injury

A rescue and recovery driver who broke his wrist after being hit by a car at a junction has received an undisclosed sum as compensation for his injury.

In November 2010, John Agius (62) was cycling along the High Street in Benfleet, Essex, when a car struck him down while emerging from a road junction. John was thrown onto the car’s bonnet, and broke his wrist due to the force of the impact.

John was immediately transported to hospital where emergency surgery was performed on his wrist. Several months after the accident occurred, John was informed by medical professionals that the bones in his wrist were not fusing as they should and that he would need to undergo a second operation to correct this.

In an attempt to encourage the bones in John’s wrist to fuse together, doctors inserted a bone graft from John’s hip into his wrist during the second surgery. This measure was not entirely successful and half a year after the accident occurred, John underwent a third surgery to attend to the numbness that he had started to notice in his hand.

Despite the three operations, John is still unable to lift heavy weights with his left hand and often requires assistance for basic tasks both at work and at home. John had to take six months off his job as a rescue and recovery driver due to his injury. John admits that he is now wary of riding his bicycle again and conscious that he will never fully regain the strength in his left hand.

John sought legal counsel, and made a claim for compensation for being hit by a car at a junction. The driver of the car denied liability for John’s accident, stating that John had been negligent himself and partially responsible for his injuries.

After some time negotiating between the two parties, an undisclosed settlement of compensation for being hit by a car at a junction was negotiated. It is believed that this settlement is the full amount initially claimed by John.

HSE Prosecutes City Council for Tractor Accident

The HSE has prosecuted Bristol City Council for health and safety violations that led to an accident in which a park employee broke her hip and sustained damage to her Achilles tendon when a tractor overturned.

In May 2012, an unnamed woman was employed as a park keeper in the Netham Park in Bristol when she was carrying out maintenance work. She was working on a tractor with a trailer attached, and applied the brake as the tractor started to descend a slope. As she braked, the tractor skidded and the park keeper swerved to avoid hitting a fence. As she did so, the tractor flipped over-throwing her from her seat.

The employee was transported to hospital to receive medical attention. It was revealed that as a result of the fall, the woman broke her pelvis and sustained a serious injury to her Achilles tendon. Due to the extent of her injuries, she was unable to return from work for a year, and was forced to take an office job on her return to work. Further surgery is required to repair the damage done to her Achilles tendon.

The HSE launched an investigation into the accident, and it was revealed that the tractor had been acquired just prior to the accident and had not yet been fitted with a seat belt. The Bristol City Council had failed to provide adequate instruction to the park keeper on how to use the machinery in a safe manner.

The HSE prosecuted the council with two beaches of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. The defendants admitted guilt, and accepted the fine of £20,000 and costs of £4,700.

The HSE inspector involved with the case-Kate Leftly-stated that the distress and pain that the employee had endured as a result of the overturning tractor accident had been preventable. She added that the employee had trained for three years to become a park keeper, but had to give up that job in spite of her training due to the injuries that she received.

The inspector also stated that the Bristol City Council’s systems for ensuring employee safety were inadequate, and that they should have ensured that the employee was properly trained to drive the tractor and they failed to identify the need for a suitable restraint.

Combine Harvester Manufacturer Found Guilty of Negligence

The manufacturer of a combine harvester which crushed a man’s fingers-John Deere Ltd-has been found guilty of negligence in designing the machine.

In June 1995, Denis Scollard (thirty years old at the time of the accident) was employed for the agricultural contractors Thomas and William Wright. He was working for various farmers in County Limerick, collecting silage and operating a John Deere 6810 combine harvester.

While operating this piece of machinery, a grass blockage occurred. Denis attempted to clear the obstacle via the inspection hatch. As he was doing so, the combine harvester’s paddles came down inside the chute, crushing the fingers on Denis’ left hand.

After receiving treatment for his injury, Denis sought legal counsel, and made a combine harvester injury claim in 1996 against his employers and received €430,000 in personal injury compensation. Thomas and William Wright subsequently made a claim against the companies from whom the machine was leased and supplied to recover what they had paid to their employee.

The leasing company-AIB Finance and Leasing-and the supplies-Geary’s Garage Ltd-in turn sought indemnity from John Deere Ltd who manufactured the combine harvester which injured Denis.

The manufacturer denied liability for Denis’ injuries, arguing that the accident could not have occurred as claimed as the paddles would not have crushed Denis’ fingers if he had followed the instructions published in the combine harvester’s manual.

They claimed that there was no scientific basis to explain how the paddles could have moved if Denis had disengaged the engine of the combine harvester as he claimed that he had. Despite their defence, Ms Justice Mary Irvine found in favour of AIB Finance & Leasing and Geary’s Garage after hearing evidence from two eye witnesses and a medical expert in the High Court in December 2007.

The judge ruled that John Deere Ltd had been negligent by “designing, manufacturing and selling a combine harvester with a design defect”. They were ordered to settle the injury claim; commenting that Denis´ injuries would have been far worse if the engine of the combine harvester had been engaged.

The decision was appealed by John Deere Ltd, and last week the case was heard at the Supreme Court before Mr Justice Frank Clarke. The judge upheld the High Court’s verdict that Denis’ injuries were a foreseeable consequence of negligence. They ordered John Deere Ltd to reimburse the €430,000 paid in settlement of Denis’ combine harvester injury claim.

How do you get Dioxin Poisoning at work?

One of the many dangers that can happen inside the workplace is dioxin poisoning. Dioxin is the term used to describe a group of various chemicals which have similar biological characteristics. There are over a hundred types of such chemicals in existence and they can be categorized according to group. There are the chlorinated dibenzofurans or the CDFs, the polychlorinated iphenyls or PCBs and the Chlorinated dibenzo dioxins or CDDs. The CDDs and the CDFs are manufactured in industrial company and they are often used for bleaching purposes, especially in drinking water plants and paper mills. CDDs and the other chemicals can be produced during the manufacture of other types of chemicals, such as cleansing compounds or pesticides. Burning materials like oil, coal or wood burned in incinerators can also create dioxins.

In terms of PCBs, they are created through lubricants and coolants. When such chemicals are added in mining machinery or heating equipment, they will be exhausted as dioxin. In terms of natural occurrences, dioxin is created from volcanic eruption or forest fire.

When does Dioxin Poisoning occur in the workplace?

Dioxin poisoning occurs when an employee breathes contaminated materials, like dust, and then ingests it to their system. Poisoning can also occur when a person comes into skin contact with a dangerous chemical. In most companies, they create chemicals, like pesticides, which can be dangerous to employees. Workers in recycling areas are also exposed to other chemicals like copper and aluminum. Such materials have small remains which can be accidentally inhaled by the workers. Workers can also be injured because of the small particles and the injuries can cause poisoning.

In extreme jobs, dioxin poisoning can also occur. For instance, fire fighters are often exposed to dioxin when they are extinguishing fires. That is why firefighters are required to wear oxygen masks while in serious situations. Employees are also required to use protective clothing especially when handling chemicals and wastes. If there are dioxins found in the workplace, like in landsite or in water areas, then it is important to stay away from such areas. Employees are often protected by dioxin poisoning insurance and compensation claim once they are exposed to such dangers.

Symptoms of Dioxin Poisoning

Symptoms of dioxin exposure include vomiting, nausea and abdominal pains. In a couple of hours, prolonged exposure will result to a skin condition known as chloracne. This skin disease is characterized as skin lesions, discolorations and rashes in the body. There will also be hormonal and metabolic changes which can result to kidney failure. In certain studies, dioxin is found to be a causative agent of cancer and male infertility. This is because dioxin can be inside the body for a long time and this prolonged exposure can have significant effects in a person’s health. Tests are needed in order to check if the person is affected by dioxin and as to what level the poisoning is. The tests are based on blood checks and employee history. If exposed to dioxin, seek medical attention immediately.

See also: http://www.injuriesboardadvice.com/

Teagasc Urges Farmers to Focus on Safety

Teagasc has urged farmers to focus on safety after safety figures released show that there has been a 35 per cent increase in injuries on farms since 2006.

In 2010 almost 2,500 injuries were reported in comparison to 1,800 in 2006. The highest amount if injuries were for trips, falls and blows (42 per cent) while livestock-related injuries accounted for 33 per cent.

Teagasc health and safety officer John McNamara said that an increase in workload and poor organisation now means that farmers often overlook safety in their rush to complete work. Pat Griffin senior inspector with the Health and Safety Authority said that there will be higher accident rates when farmers grow in size if nothing is done to improve safety.

Warning Issued after Death of Boy on Farm

Farmers and the public have been warned by the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA) to be vigilant during current seasonal farm work involving heavy machinery and farm vehicles.

The warning follows the death of an 11-year-old Alan Quirke who was struck by a trailer in a farm accident at Brensha, three miles from Tipperary town.

The chairman of the ICMSA’s rural development committee, Willie O’Donoghue, released a general safety message urging rural dwellers to be careful during silage season, he said ‘We would appeal to all other road users – and most particularly, visitors to farming areas – to be aware of the dangers of increased agricultural traffic on rural roads and the need to slow down.’

Lyme Disease on Farms in Ireland

Lyme disease also known as Lyme borreliosis is a contagious disorder brought about by various species of bacteria. This is a common disease spread about by ticks from the Genus Borrelia species of bacteria that infect human beings by a bite.

The characteristics of this disease are: fever, head pains, tiredness, dejection and skin irritations known as erythema migrans. These may not be fatal but if left unattended might cause a breakdown in the central nervous system and the heart and joints may also be affected. In the early detection of the illness antibiotics may prove to be useful in eliminating the symptoms and treating the disease but if left untreated for a long period of time the illness can be debilitating and treatment may took a long time.

The early symptom is a round spread out of skin irritations that happens days after the tick bite. The skin irritation is reddish and warm to the touch but may not be accompanied by pain. The sufferer may also experience a bout of flu-like signs including fever, headache, fatigue and muscle ache. However, even if this symptom does not show up it is not a guarantee that the patient is free from the disease.

The bacteria-causing this disease may very well be present anywhere at home or even in the working place. So a worker must be alert to avoid bites from these hard ticks. Protective outfits and gears in the work area are highly suggested to keep away hard ticks. Pertmethrin spray can also help in the elimination of these ticks. People who are fond of domesticated animals like dogs and cats should make sure that their pets are not infected with these hard ticks to avoid infection.

As much as possible try to avoid tick-infected areas to avoid Lyme Disease. Monitor your pets to safeguard them against the attack of ticks. Maintain the cleanliness of your homes as well as your working area to get rid of tick infestations. This disease may not be as serious as it seems but the discomfort it would bring especially when you want to scratch the affected area may not be good for you. You might just be spreading the infection with your hands.

This disease can be a little uncomfortable especially when one is in the working place. Upon the detection of the disease a worker may fill up the work accident book provided by the company. This work accident book contains the history of the disease while at the working area. The company can use this to assess the damage to the employee and to make precautionary measures to prevent the widespread of the disease. Every company is required by the law to keep this work accident book for the employer and employee benefit.

Lyme Disease is a skin irritation that needs special care and cleanliness, Make sure that you get proper medication for the itch and prevent it from spreading out. You might mistake it for flu at first but when the skin patches appear, it is a sign of the disease. You will of course still need to visit medical professionals to be completely sure.

HSA Investigate Death of Boy in Farming Accident

The Health and Safety Authority (HSA) and Garda have begun separate investigations into the death of a boy in a farming accident in west Cork.

14-year-old Ciaran Casey from Collatrum, Church Cross, near Skibbereen is believed to have been killed when he became trapped between a digger and a wall while bringing cows into a shed.

HSA inspectors are on site and have begun their investigations into the accident.

Claim of Mullingar Woman Who Lost An Eye Put on Hold

The claim of a woman from Mullingar, Co Westmeath who pursued a compensation after losing an eye at her partner’s parents’ farmhouse has had her claim put on hold. Elaine Newman, who lost her eye after a number of shards of glass entered it after a window shattered, made her claim under the Occupier’s Liability Act.

After hearing how Elaine’s self-esteem had been crushed by the accident, Mr Justice Iarflaith O’Neill decided to put the claim on hold. A report commissioned into the accident found that although the glass may have been faulty, that there is no requirement which obliges farmhouse owners to fit safety glass in the type of window which was involved in Elaine’s accident.

Conference Hears of Farm Accident Dangers

An international conference on farm safety organised by the Health and Safety Authority, the Farm Safety Partnership Advisory Committee and Teagasc has heard how the number of fatal farm accidents in Ireland is set to rise again this year, eclipsing the 20-year high last year.

“People working on farms need to be more conscious of safety requirements, in particular since in many instances they are working on their own. A significant change in mindset is required if we are to prevent further serious farm accidents,” commented Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney, who was serving as key speaker at the event.

“By continuously talking about and being aware of farm safety we can together bring about a change of culture and farmer thinking,” he continued.

The conference drew attendees from The US, UK, Norway, Denmark and Italy.

Kansas Man Awarded $1.6m for Loss of Leg

A man from Wilson County, Kansas has been awarded $1.6m in product liability compensation after he lost his leg when it became trapped in a grain bin. Sam Rollings pursued a claim for compensation against Ken Babcock Sales Inc, the designer of the grain bin, and his employer, the Fredonia Cooperative Association of Fredonia, Kansas.

The accident occurred in January 2007 when Rollings slipped and his right foot became entangled in the drag chain of the grain bin conveyor system. He suffered such severe injuries to his right foot and lower leg that surgeons could not save it.

It took a jury seven hours of deliberation to decide to award compensation to Rollings.

Cavan Cattle Drover to Receive Compensation for Bull Kick

Patrick Lynch of Crubany, Co Cavan is to receive damages from his employer after the cattle drover was kicked by a bullock. Lynch, who was one of three cattle drovers employed by Cavan Co-op Mart in October 2003 to escort cattle to a sales ring, had to do perform the job of all three men on the day which he was injured, as the other two had called in sick.

Lynch, who was kicked in the groin, suffered trauma to one of his testis, and was taken to Cavan General Hospital for treatment.

The case is now to be referred to the High Court for an assessment of personal injury damages.

Laois Teenager Awarded Compensation for Lost Eye

A teenager whose eye was impaled on an expose milking machine hook has been awarded €110,000 in compensation by a judge at the High Court. David Booth, now 17, was only eight years old when the accident happened on his family’s farm in April 2002. Booth, from Stradbally in Co Laois, pursued a claim for compensation against Senior Milking Machine Company Ltd and Stradbally Farm Services, which it was claimed were negligent on the grounds that the milking machine had been built to a safe enough standard.

David had no recollection of the events leading up to the accident.

See also: http://www.defamationireland.com/personal-injury-claims/

Irish Farm Deaths Rose by 127% in 2010

The number of deaths on Irish farms rose by 127% in 2010, a report released by the Health and Safety Authority has revealed. The 25 deaths on farms which occurred last year is up from 11 the year before, and represents over 50% of all workplace fatalities in Ireland in 2010.

“Farming is a difficult and challenging occupation, many involved are self-employed and the pressures that farmers are under can be intense at times,” commented Martin O’Halloran, chief executive of the HSA.

“However the fact is that the types of farm accidents that are causing deaths and serious accidents, such as those involving machinery and livestock, can be prevented.”

 

HSA Launches New Farming Guidelines

The Health and Safety Authority (HSA) has launched a new set of farming guidelines which it hopes will help to lower the amount of accidents on Irish farms, the most dangerous workplaces in the country.

The HSA wants to help farmers to identify risks and hazards on their farms, including the risks posed by farm animals, which unknown to most, are one of the primary causes of accidents on farms in Ireland.

The initiative has been undertaken with the support of farming organisations and contains guidelines on how to use tractors, how to take care around livestock and how to cope with the presence of overhead powerlines.

Waterford Teen Awarded €1.28m

A teenager from Co Waterford has been awarded €1.28m for a personal injury on a farm by a judge at the High Court. Mr Justice John Quirke awarded the sum to TJ Kearns, for an accident in which he lost his leg in April 2001.

Kearns was nine years old when his accident occurred, during which his leg became entangled in a power seed sowing machine. Kearns was in a tractor pulling a piece of machinery at the time.

The defendants, John Joe Flynn, Eugene Flynn and Gerald Flynn of Dunmore East, Co Waterford, admitted liability.

TJ’s claim was made though his father, Tom Kearns.

California Workers’ Compensation Institute Reports $1.46bn Loss

California Workers’ Compensation Institute has released figures which show that the compensation system for Californian workers was down $1.46bn, which equates to 5.5% of Californian Workers’ Compensation claims.

Minor wounds, back problems, arm, shoulder and knee damage were among the most commonly claimed for injuries.

In Ireland, nearly half of accidents on farms involve tractors and other machinery (49%), livestock accounts for 15%, and falls from height and drowning both represent 12% of all claims made. Unfortunately, the Injuries Board Ireland does not provide any information on farm accident claims in the same way as is done in the United States.